Pete Easterbrook, our criminal investigations manager, said:

“Steven Renouf ran his security business with a complete disregard for the safeguards provided for by regulation.It’s important to recognise that the offences Renouf committed were not ‘one-off’ or occasional, but took place over many years. During that time Renouf sought to profit whilst ignoring the best interests both of his customers and of his employees.

Apart from being a criminal offence, the supply of unlicensed operatives has a negative effect on the wider security industry. It allows unscrupulous operations to undercut legitimate businesses. It also takes employment opportunities away from correctly trained operatives who are licensed by the SIA.”

Our investigators made a pre-planned inspection visit to the school on 07 February this year, and found two unlicensed security operatives at work. The school immediately cancelled Renouf’s contract.

We launched an investigation, and made formal requests for information from Taghna Security Services. The company’s responses were incomplete and included falsified invoices and other incorrect information intended to show that Renouf had been operating legally. As a result, Renouf was charged not only with failing to provide information, but also with two counts of providing false information. These charges were in addition to 20 counts of supplying unlicensed security staff.

Five of Renouf’s employees, who had all previously pled guilty to working unlawfully for Taghna Security Services as unlicensed security guards, were sentenced at Swindon Magistrates’ Court on 09 October.

Pete Easterbrook added:

It’s appropriate in this case that we not only prosecuted the owner of the security company, but also those employees who worked unlicensed. We recognise that Mr Renouf attempted to convince these operatives that an SIA licence was not required. However this does not absolve them of responsibility and they have also rightly had to face the consequences of their actions in court.

The court ordered the following sentences:

• Christopher Pittard received a nine month conditional discharge. He was ordered to pay £150 in costs plus a £20 victim surcharge. Pittard was formerly employed by Stephen Renouf and worked at the school while unlicensed for around five years.
• Siobhan Renouf received a £250 fine, and was ordered to pay £300 in costs plus a £30 victim surcharge. Siobhan Renouf is the step-daughter of Stephen Renouf, and had worked at the school unlicensed since November 2017.
• Bamba Jahateh received a six month conditional discharge, as well as an order to pay £150 in costs plus a £20 victim surcharge. Jahateh had worked at the school as an unlicensed security guard since September 2016.
• Momodou Jaiteh received a six month conditional discharge and is required to pay £150 prosecution costs plus a £20 victim surcharge. Jaiteh worked as an unlicensed security guard at the school from November 2015.

Renouf’s case has been adjourned to 07 December, and transferred to Salisbury Crown Court for sentence and POCA (Proceeds of Crime Act) proceedings.